Online Participation Tools and Their Benefits for Participatory Democracy: Reflections and Complementary Perspectives

The digital transformation has raised high expectations about e-participation tools enhancing democracy. However, assessments often reflect technological determinism and normative biases. This chapter examines two key overlooked dimensions: (1) the functional role of e-participation in policy processes and (2) biases rooted in techno-deterministic and normative assumptions. First, the analysis advocates categorizing e-participation tools by their function within policy phases - monitoring, agenda-setting, and decision-making - rather than relying on typologies detached from political contexts. Second, it critiques the tendency to overemphasize technical capabilities while underestimating socio-political factors shaping participation. While early digital democracy debates fluctuated between utopian and dystopian views, deterministic assumptions about the democratizing power of online tools persist. Empirical evidence suggests that e-participation has not (yet) significantly increased engagement or inclusivity, as participation remains tied to socio-economic resources, reinforcing inequalities. Digital divides persist, challenging inclusive online participation. Moreover, weak integration with institutional decision-making limits impact. To enhance e-participation’s legitimacy and effectiveness, inclusivity must be prioritized, and digital tools should be better aligned with the procedures of formal policy-making. This chapter aims to contribute to a more balanced understanding of e-participation’s potential and limitations.