Options
2023
Report
Title
D1.2 - CPA Consultation Report and Repository of Best Practices
Abstract
Deliverable 1.2 is the second output of Work Package 1. The concepts used in this deliverable are based on D1.1, which provided the knowledge base for RiskPACC on the topics of disaster resilience, vulnerability, and risk perception as well as how these terms are operationalized by civil protection authorities (CPAs). The aim of the work is to:
- Study emergency and disaster management approaches and good practices of CPAs of all administration levels, through literature review, surveys as well as structured and productive dialogue with national, regional and local CPAs, in order to understand and identify similarities and differences of ‘top-down’ disaster resilience and risk communication approaches.
To accomplish the objectives of this deliverable, CPA practices were evaluated using three different techniques:
- Review of emergency and disaster management doctrine and practices at the international and EU level, including a brief description of practices for several countries across the world.
- Description of disaster risk management (DRM) approaches and current practices at national level for EU countries represented by RiskPACC partners gathered from literature and interviews.
- Interviews with CPA practitioners at a local, regional and national level. Twenty-two (22) interviews were conducted in total, 5 with local, 10 with regional and 7 with national level CPA representatives.
Following the introduction, the first section of the report reviews emergency and disaster management aspects and doctrine at the international, EU and national level. Then, the methodology, implementation and analysis of results from the consultation with national, regional and local CPAs is presented, using interviews based on an open-ended questionnaire designed by RiskPACC consortium members involved in WP1 and WP2.
Practices used at the international, EU and national level for several countries are described in the following subsections, aiming to provide an overview of various approaches used, as well as interconnection and cooperation of CPAs worldwide.
In the conclusions (Section 3), an inclusive evaluation of the results of Task 1.2 titled "Multidisciplinary Stakeholder Consultation" is presented.
This deliverable provides the first look at empirical research on CPA resilience and risk perception practices that will be used for the gap analysis for D1.3 and the foundational knowledge needed to feed into the other WPs of the project.
- Study emergency and disaster management approaches and good practices of CPAs of all administration levels, through literature review, surveys as well as structured and productive dialogue with national, regional and local CPAs, in order to understand and identify similarities and differences of ‘top-down’ disaster resilience and risk communication approaches.
To accomplish the objectives of this deliverable, CPA practices were evaluated using three different techniques:
- Review of emergency and disaster management doctrine and practices at the international and EU level, including a brief description of practices for several countries across the world.
- Description of disaster risk management (DRM) approaches and current practices at national level for EU countries represented by RiskPACC partners gathered from literature and interviews.
- Interviews with CPA practitioners at a local, regional and national level. Twenty-two (22) interviews were conducted in total, 5 with local, 10 with regional and 7 with national level CPA representatives.
Following the introduction, the first section of the report reviews emergency and disaster management aspects and doctrine at the international, EU and national level. Then, the methodology, implementation and analysis of results from the consultation with national, regional and local CPAs is presented, using interviews based on an open-ended questionnaire designed by RiskPACC consortium members involved in WP1 and WP2.
Practices used at the international, EU and national level for several countries are described in the following subsections, aiming to provide an overview of various approaches used, as well as interconnection and cooperation of CPAs worldwide.
In the conclusions (Section 3), an inclusive evaluation of the results of Task 1.2 titled "Multidisciplinary Stakeholder Consultation" is presented.
This deliverable provides the first look at empirical research on CPA resilience and risk perception practices that will be used for the gap analysis for D1.3 and the foundational knowledge needed to feed into the other WPs of the project.
Author(s)
Person Involved
Funding(s)
Funder
Open Access
File(s)
Rights
CC BY 4.0: Creative Commons Attribution
Language
English
Keyword(s)