• English
  • Deutsch
  • Log In
    Password Login
    Research Outputs
    Fundings & Projects
    Researchers
    Institutes
    Statistics
Repository logo
Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft
  1. Home
  2. Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft
  3. Artikel
  4. Solar thermal vs. PV with a heat pump: A comparison of different charging technologies for seasonal storage systems in district heating networks
 
  • Details
  • Full
Options
2024
Journal Article
Title

Solar thermal vs. PV with a heat pump: A comparison of different charging technologies for seasonal storage systems in district heating networks

Abstract
The majority of district heating networks (DHNs) in Germany and other European countries are still supplied by fossil fuels. While several possible technical solutions exist to decarbonize DHNs, the problem is the availability of solar energy - thermal and electric - or other renewable electric sources during winter. A solution is to shift the available energy from the summer to the winter by using seasonal thermal energy storage systems. Especially pit thermal energy storage systems (PTES) have shown an economic advantage compared to other storage types. Therefore, we would like further to investigate the design of PTES under different techno-economic conditions. In this study, different charging options for the PTES were examined. Solar thermal energy was compared to photovoltaic (PV), supplying an air-source heat pump (ASHP). We developed an open-source Python package based on mixed-integer linear programming, minimizing the total system cost, i.e., the annuity, including opex and capex. The tool selects, operates, and designs energy converters and storages. Furthermore, it optimizes the network’s storage capacity during the operation. The optimization takes the characteristics of an existing DHN as input and designs the supply systems across different locations (LOCs). The model separates the hydraulic and thermal calculation and builds up a multi-stage process to consider temperatures inside the network and the PTES.
The tool was applied to a DHN in Eastern Germany. The results show a low sensitivity to the electricity price in all concepts. Operating the PTES at low temperatures negatively affects the heat capacity, and therefore, it is best suited for high-temperature networks. The concept of PV with an ASHP is better suited for densely populated regions. However, both concepts have a total system cost above 20 ct/kWh for an area price of over 120 €/m2 .
For an electricity price of ca. 19 ct/kWh, the total system cost is below 17 ct/kWh for both concepts.
Author(s)
Sporleder, Maximilian  orcid-logo
Fraunhofer-Einrichtung für Energieinfrastrukturen und Geothermie IEG  
Rath, Michael  orcid-logo
Fraunhofer-Einrichtung für Energieinfrastrukturen und Geothermie IEG  
Ragwitz, Mario  
Fraunhofer-Einrichtung für Energieinfrastrukturen und Geothermie IEG  
Journal
Energy conversion and management: X  
Open Access
DOI
10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100564
Language
English
Fraunhofer-Einrichtung für Energieinfrastrukturen und Geothermie IEG  
Keyword(s)
  • MILP

  • District heating

  • Seasonal storage

  • Sector coupling

  • Cookie settings
  • Imprint
  • Privacy policy
  • Api
  • Contact
© 2024