Automated Method for SLAM Evaluation in GNSS-Denied Areas

The automated inspection and mapping of engineering structures are mainly based on photogrammetry and laser scanning. Mobile robotic platforms like unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs), but also handheld platforms, allow efficient automated mapping. Engineering structures like bridges shadow global navigation satellite system (GNSS), which complicates precise localization. Simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) algorithms offer a sufficient solution, since they do not require GNSS. However, testing and comparing SLAM algorithms in GNSS-denied areas is difficult due to missing ground truth data. This work presents an approach to measuring the performance of SLAM in indoor and outdoor GNSS-denied areas using a terrestrial scanner Leica RTC360 and a tachymeter to acquire point cloud and trajectory information. The proposed method is independent of time synchronization between robot and tachymeter and also works on sparse SLAM point clouds. For the evaluation of the proposed method, three LiDAR-based SLAM algorithms called KISS-ICP, SC-LIO-SAM, and MA-LIO are tested using a UGV equipped with two light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensors and an inertial measurement unit (IMU). KISS-ICP is based solely on a single LiDAR scanner and SC-LIO-SAM also uses an IMU. MA-LIO, which allows multiple (different) LiDAR sensors, is tested on a horizontal and vertical one and an IMU. Time synchronization between the tachymeter and SLAM data during post-processing allows calculating the root mean square (RMS) absolute trajectory error, mean relative trajectory error, and the mean point cloud to reference point cloud distance. It shows that the proposed method is an efficient approach to measure the performance of SLAM in GNSS-denied areas. Additionally, the method shows the superior performance of MA-LIO in four of six test tracks with 5 to 7 cm RMS trajectory error, followed by SC-LIO-SAM and KISS-ICP in last place. SC-LIO-SAM reaches the lowest point cloud to reference point cloud distance in four of six test tracks, with 4 to 12 cm.