• English
  • Deutsch
  • Log In
    Password Login
    Research Outputs
    Fundings & Projects
    Researchers
    Institutes
    Statistics
Repository logo
Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft
  1. Home
  2. Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft
  3. Scopus
  4. Negative Results of Fusing Code and Documentation for Learning to Accurately Identify Sensitive Source and Sink Methods
 
  • Details
  • Full
Options
2023
Conference Paper
Title

Negative Results of Fusing Code and Documentation for Learning to Accurately Identify Sensitive Source and Sink Methods

Title Supplement
An Application to the Android Framework for Data Leak Detection
Abstract
Apps on mobile phones manipulate all sorts of data, including sensitive data, leading to privacy-related concerns. Recent regulations like the European GDPR provide rules for the processing of personal and sensitive data, like that no such data may be leaked without the consent of the user.Researchers have proposed sophisticated approaches to track sensitive data within mobile apps, all of which rely on specific lists of sensitive SOURCE and SINK API methods. The data flow analysis results greatly depend on these lists' quality. Previous approaches either used incomplete hand-written lists that quickly became outdated or relied on machine learning. The latter, however, leads to numerous false positives, as we show.This paper introduces CoDoC, a tool that aims to revive the machine-learning approach to precisely identify privacy-related SOURCE and SINK API methods. In contrast to previous approaches, CoDoC uses deep learning techniques and combines the source code with the documentation of API methods. Firstly, we propose novel definitions that clarify the concepts of sensitive SOURCE and SINK methods. Secondly, based on these definitions, we build a new ground truth of Android methods representing sensitive SOURCE, SINK, and NEITHER (i.e., no source or sink) methods that will be used to train our classifier.We evaluate CoDoC and show that, on our validation dataset, it achieves a precision, recall, and F1 score of 91% in 10-fold cross-validation, outperforming the state-of-the-art SUSI when used on the same dataset. However, similarly to existing tools, we show that in the wild, i.e., with unseen data, CoDoC performs poorly and generates many false positive results. Our findings, together with time-tested results of previous approaches, suggest that machine-learning models for abstract concepts such as privacy fail in practice despite good lab results. To encourage future research, we release all our artifacts to the community.
Author(s)
Samhi, Jordan
Kober, Maria
Kaboré, Abdoul Kader
Arzt, Steven  
Fraunhofer-Institut für Sichere Informationstechnologie SIT  
Bissyandé, Tégawendé François
Klein, Jacques
Mainwork
IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering, SANER 2023. Proceedings  
Conference
International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering 2023  
Open Access
DOI
10.1109/SANER56733.2023.00091
Language
English
Fraunhofer-Institut für Sichere Informationstechnologie SIT  
  • Cookie settings
  • Imprint
  • Privacy policy
  • Api
  • Contact
© 2024