• English
  • Deutsch
  • Log In
    Password Login
    Research Outputs
    Fundings & Projects
    Researchers
    Institutes
    Statistics
Repository logo
Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft
  1. Home
  2. Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft
  3. Artikel
  4. Evaluation of Segmentation Methods on Head and Neck CT: Auto-segmentation Challenge 2015
 
  • Details
  • Full
Options
2017
Journal Article
Title

Evaluation of Segmentation Methods on Head and Neck CT: Auto-segmentation Challenge 2015

Abstract
Purpose: Automated delineation of structures and organs is a key step in medical imaging. However, due to the large number and diversity of structures and the large variety of segmentation algorithms, a consensus is lacking as to which automated segmentation method works best for certain applications. Segmentation challenges are a good approach for unbiased evaluation and comparison of segmentation algorithms. Methods: In this work, we describe and present the results of the Head and Neck Auto-Segmentation Challenge 2015, a satellite event at the Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Interventions (MICCAI) 2015 conference. Six teams participated in a challenge to segment nine structures in the head and neck region of CT images: brainstem, mandible, chiasm, bilateral optic nerves, bilateral parotid glands, and bilateral submandibular glands. Results: This paper presents the quantitative results of this challenge using multiple established error metrics and a well-defined ranking system. The strengths and weaknesses of the different auto-segmentation approaches are analyzed and discussed. Conclusions: The Head and Neck Auto-Segmentation Challenge 2015 was a good opportunity to assess the current state-of-the-art in segmentation of organs at risk for radiotherapy treatment. Participating teams had the possibility to compare their approaches to other methods under unbiased and standardized circumstances. The results demonstrate a clear tendency toward more general purpose and fewer structure-specific segmentation algorithms.
Author(s)
Raudaschl, Patrik F.
UMIT Hall
Zaffino, Paolo
Univ. of Catanzaro
Sharp, Gregory C.
Harvard Medical School
Spadea, Maria Francesca
Univ. of Catanzaro
Chen, Antong
Merck and Co
Dawant, Benoit M.
Vanderbilt Univ.
Albrecht, Thomas
Varian Medical Systems
Gass, Tobias
Varian Medical Systems
Langgut, Christoph
Univ. of Basel
Lüthi, Marcel
Univ. of Basel
Jung, Florian
Fraunhofer-Institut für Graphische Datenverarbeitung IGD  
Knapp, Oliver
Fraunhofer-Institut für Graphische Datenverarbeitung IGD  
Wesarg, Stefan  
Fraunhofer-Institut für Graphische Datenverarbeitung IGD  
Mannion-Haworth, Richard
Imorphics Ltd.
Bowes, Mike
Imorphics Ltd.
Ashman, Annaliese
Imorphics Ltd.
Guillard, Gwenael
Imorphics Ltd.
Brett, Alan
Imorphics Ltd.
Vincent, Graham
Imorphics Ltd.
Orbes-Arteaga, Mauricio
Univ. of Colombia
Cárdenas-Peña, David
Univ. of Colombia
Castellanos-Dominguez, German
Univ. of Colombia
Aghdasi, Nava
Univ. of Washington
Li, Yangming
Univ. of Washington
Berens, Angelique
Univ. of Washington
Moe, Kris
Univ. of Washington
Hannaford, Blake
Univ. of Washington
Schubert, Rainer
UMIT Hall
Fritscher, Karl D.
UMIT Hall
Journal
Medical physics  
DOI
10.1002/mp.12197
Additional link
Full text
Language
English
Fraunhofer-Institut für Graphische Datenverarbeitung IGD  
Keyword(s)
  • Automatic segmentation

  • Model based segmentations

  • Segmentation

  • Medical imaging

  • Individual Health

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

  • atlas-based segmentation

  • segmentation challenge

  • Cookie settings
  • Imprint
  • Privacy policy
  • Api
  • Contact
© 2024