Now showing 1 - 10 of 29
  • Publication
    Assessment of policy pathways for reaching the EU target of (at least) 27% renewable energies by 2030
    ( 2019)
    Resch, Gustav
    ;
    Liebmann, Lukas
    ;
    Geipel, Jasper
    ;
    Janeiro, Luis
    ;
    Klessmann, Corinna
    ;
    ; ;
    Rio, Pablo del
    As an important first step in defining the framework for renewable energies (RE) within the European Union post 2020, a binding EU-wide target to achieve a renewables share of at least 27% of gross final energy demand by 2030 was adopted by the European Council and Parliament in October 2014. On 30 November 2016, the next step was taken: The European Commission published a package of proposed legislative measures for the time horizon from 2020 to 2030 called ""Clean Energy for all Europeans"", commonly referred to as the ""Winter Package"". It is aimed at facilitating the clean energy transition while developing the internal market for electricity, thus fostering the Energy Union. Within the scope of the Intelligent Energy Europe project ""towards2030-dialogue"" we have facilitated and guided the RE policy dialogue for the period up to 2030 over the past number of years. The dialogue process was coupled with in-depth and continuous analysis of relevant topics that included renewable energies in all energy sectors, but with more detailed analyses for renewable electricity. The analytical works included, for example, a first critical reflection on the Winter Package as well as a model-based analysis of distinct renewable electricity policy pathways up to 2030, including options for coordinating and aligning national support schemes as well as the clustering of regional support schemes. This chapter describes the approach taken and presents some of our key results together with recommendations on the way forward.
  • Publication
    Do almost mature renewable energy technologies still need dedicated support towards 2030?
    ( 2019) ; ;
    Rio, Pablo del
    ;
    Resch, Gustav
    ;
    Klessmann, Corinna
    ;
    Hassel, Arndt
    ;
    Elkerbout, Milan
    ;
    Rawlins, James
    The discussion on whether and how to continue support for almost mature renewable electricity (RES-E) technologies, such as onshore wind and PV, has recently intensified. In this paper we analyze arguments in the literature in favor and against the phase-out of renewables support in the context of increasingly competitive RES-E technologies. We conclude that there are good reasons to continue dedicated RES-E policies beyond 2020 for those technologies. Dedicated RES-E support can provide a predictable, secure investment framework that lowers the risk premiums required by investors and therefore reduces the capital costs of RES-E. In addition, there are still significant cost reduction potentials for these technologies. The increased use of renewables has multiple socio-economic benefits in addition to climate change mitigation. These arguments are still valid when looking at the current market situation characterized by oversupply and low prices on both the CO2 market and some power markets in Europe. Since renewables are not the main reason for the current oversupply, it would not be effective to take actions towards restoring market equilibrium in the form of radical or overall phase-out of RES-E support.
  • Publication
    How can the renewables targets be reached cost-effectively? Policy options for the development of renewables and the transmission grid
    ( 2018) ; ; ;
    Resch, Gustav
    ;
    Olmos, Luis
    ;
    Ramos, Andrés
    ;
    Rivier, Michel
    Increasing the share of renewable energy sources in the electricity sector (RES-E) contributes to achieving the European energy and climate targets including a 27% share of renewables in final energy consumption by 2030. We assess the future costs of the power sector for different RES-target levels and support schemes including generation costs, system operation costs and transmission grid development costs based on three power sector models. The results show similar power system costs for different target levels. RES-E shares below 70% involve limited infrastructure costs that are below 2.6% of the overall system costs. The impacts of the modelled RES-E policies, an EU quota and national feed-in premiums on transmission costs are ambiguous: Contrary to expectations, the costs of transmission network development under quota obligations are lower than under technology-specific feed-in premiums for RES-E penetration levels up to 50%. The drivers of transmission costs include not only a concentration of renewable capacity, but also the exact location of RES-E capacity with respect to existing power plants and the strength of the existing infrastructure. Quota obligations lead to higher grid costs than feed-in premiums if the RES-E share amounts to 70% due to the stronger regional concentration of RES power plants.
  • Publication
  • Publication
    Issue Paper No. 11: Do almost mature renewable energy technologies still need dedicated support towards 2030?
    (European Commission, 2017) ; ;
    Rio, Pablo del
    ;
    Resch, Gustav
    ;
    Janeiro, Luis
    ;
    Klessmann, Corinna
    ;
    Hassel, Arndt
    ;
    Elkerbout, Milan
    ;
    Rawlins, James
  • Publication
    Renewable energy deployment in Europe up to 2030 and the aim of a triple dividend
    ( 2016) ;
    Fougeyrollas, Arnaud
    ;
    Nathani, Carsten
    ;
    ; ;
    Resch, Gustav
    ;
    Schade, Wolfgang
    ;
    ;
    Renewable energy sources (RES) play a key role in the European Commission's 2030 Climate and Energy Framework, which aims for a low-carbon economy that increases the security of the EU's energy supplies and creates new opportunities for growth and jobs, among other benefits. We assess whether renewable energy deployment in Europe can provide this ""triple dividend"", at which ambition levels of 2030 RES targets and what the role of the support policy scheme for electricity is. We apply two types of models: a detailed techno-economic sector model of the deployment of RES and two macroeconomic models. Our findings suggest that up to 2030 our triple-dividend hypothesis holds even under a declining role of Europe as technology provider for the rest of the world. Additional emission reductions of up to 1040 Mt CO2, as compared to a baseline scenario in 2030, are possible. Demand for fossil fuels can likewise be reduced due to the deployment of renewable energy sources by up to 150 Mtoe. More ambiguous is the order of magnitude of the effects on GDP and employment, which differs noticeably depending on the economic theory applied in the different models. Nevertheless, both models predict slightly higher GDP and employment in 2030 when implementing ambitious RES targets.
  • Publication
    Issue Paper No. 4: The EU 2030 framework for renewables - effective effort sharing through public benchmarks
    (European Commission, 2015)
    Zehetner, Christoph
    ;
    Liebmann, Lukas
    ;
    Resch, Gustav
    ;
    Genoese, Fabio
    ;
  • Publication
    Issue Paper No. 2: Implementing the EU 2030 climate and energy framework - a closer look at renewables and opportunities for an Energy Union
    (European Commission, 2015) ; ;
    Resch, Gustav
    ;
    Liebmann, Lukas
    ;
    Genoese, Fabio
    ;
    Pató, Zsuzsanna
    ;
    Szabó, Lásló
  • Publication
    DIA-CORE Policy brief: Options for a sustainable EU renewable energy policy
    (European Commission, 2015) ; ; ;
    Brückmann, Robert
    ;
    ;
    Resch, Gustav
    ;
    Hoefnagels, Ric
    ;
    May, Nils
    ;
    Genoese, Fabio
  • Publication