• English
  • Deutsch
  • Log In
    Password Login
    Research Outputs
    Fundings & Projects
    Researchers
    Institutes
    Statistics
Repository logo
Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft
  1. Home
  2. Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft
  3. Konferenzschrift
  4. Implications of using systematic decomposition structures to organize building LCA information: A comparative analysis of national standards and guidelines- IEA EBC ANNEX 72
 
  • Details
  • Full
Options
2020
Conference Paper
Title

Implications of using systematic decomposition structures to organize building LCA information: A comparative analysis of national standards and guidelines- IEA EBC ANNEX 72

Abstract
Introduction: The application of the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) technique to a building requires the collection and organization of a large amount of data over its life cycle. The systematic decomposition method can be used to classify building components, elements and materials, overcome specific difficulties that are encountered when attempting to complete the life cycle inventory and increase the reliability and transparency of results. In this paper, which was developed in the context of the research project IEA EBC Annex 72, we demonstrate the implications of taking such approach and describe the results of a comparison among different national standards/guidelines that are used to conduct LCA for building decomposition. Methods: We initially identified the main characteristics of the standards/guidelines used by Annex participant countries. The "be2226" reference office building was used as a reference to apply the different national standards/guidelines related to building decomposition. It served as a basis of comparison, allowing us to identify the implications of using different systems/standards in the LCA practice, in terms of how these differences affect the LCI structures, LCA databases and the methods used to communicate results. We also analyzed the implications of integrating these standards/guidelines into Building Information Modelling (BIM) to support LCA. Results: Twelve national classification systems/standards/guidelines for the building decomposition were compared. Differences were identified among the levels of decomposition and grouping principles, as well as the consequences of these differences that were related to the LCI organization. In addition, differences were observed among the LCA databases and the structures of the results. Conclusions: The findings of this study summarize and provide an overview of the most relevant aspects of using a standardized building decomposition structure to conduct LCA. Recommendations are formulated on the basis of these findings.
Author(s)
Soust-Verdaguer, B.
Univ. de Sevilla, Instituto de Arquitectura yCiencias de la Construcción, Spain
García Martínez, A.
Univ. de Sevilla, Instituto de Arquitectura yCiencias de la Construcción, Spain
Llatas, C.
Univ. de Sevilla, Instituto de Arquitectura yCiencias de la Construcción, Spain
Gómez de Cózar, J.C.
Univ. de Sevilla, Instituto de Arquitectura y Ciencias de la Construcción, Spain
Allacker, K.
KU Leuven, Belgium
Trigaux, D.
KU Leuven, Belgium ; EnergyVille / VITO, Belgium
Alsema, E.
W/E Consultants, Netherlands
Berg, B.
BRANZ, New Zealand
Dowdell, D.
BRANZ, New Zealand
Debacker, W.
EnergyVille / VITO, Belgium
Frischknecht, R.
treeze Ltd., Switzerland
Ramseier, L.
treeze Ltd., Switzerland
Veselka, J.
Czech Techn. Univ. in Prague Univ. Centre for Energy Efficient Buildings, Czech Republic
Volf, M.
Czech Techn. Univ. in Prague Univ. Centre for Energy Efficient Buildings, Czech Republic
Hajek, P.
Czech Techn. Univ. in Prague Univ. Centre for Energy Efficient Buildings, Czech Republic
Lupísek, A.
Czech Techn. Univ. in Prague Univ. Centre for Energy Efficient Buildings, Czech Republic
Malik, Z.
Czech Techn. Univ. in Prague Univ. Centre for Energy Efficient Buildings, Czech Republic
Habert, G.
ETH Chair of Sustainable Construction, Switzerland
Hollberg, Alexander
ETH Chair of Sustainable Construction, Switzerland ; Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Sweden
Lasvaux, S.
University of Applied Sciences of Western Switzerland
Peuportier, B.
MINES ParisTech Centre Efficacité énergétique des Systèmes, France
Pomponi, F.
Edinburgh Napier University Resource Efficient Built Environment Lab, Scotland
Wastiel, L.
Edinburgh Napier University Resource Efficient Built Environment Lab, Scotland
Gomes, V.
University of Campinas GBLab, Brazil
Zara, O.
University of Campinas GBLab, Brazil;
Gomes, M.
Federal University of Espirito Santo, Brazil
Gusson Baiocchi, A.
University of Campinas GBLab, Brazil
Pulgrossi, L.
University of Campinas GBLab, Brazil
Ouellet-Plamondon, C.
Université du Québec, Department of Construction Engineering, Canada
Moncaster, A.
Open University, UK
Horn, Rafael  
Fraunhofer-Institut für Bauphysik IBP  
Lenz, K.  
Fraunhofer-Institut für Bauphysik IBP  
Balouktsi, M.
Karlsruher Institut für Technologie, Fachgebiet Immobilienwirtschaft
Luetzkendorf, T.
Karlsruher Institut für Technologie, Fachgebiet Immobilienwirtschaft
Röck, M.
Graz University of Technology Working Group Sustainable Construction, Austria
Hoxha, E.
Graz University of Technology Working Group Sustainable Construction, Austria
Passer, A.
Graz University of Technology Working Group Sustainable Construction, Austria
Mainwork
WSBE 2020, World Sustainable Built Environment - Beyond 2020  
Conference
World Sustainable Built Environment Conference (WSBE) 2020  
Open Access
File(s)
Download (638.39 KB)
Rights
CC BY 4.0: Creative Commons Attribution
DOI
10.1088/1755-1315/588/2/022008
10.24406/publica-r-411898
Additional link
Full text
Language
English
Fraunhofer-Institut für Bauphysik IBP  
  • Cookie settings
  • Imprint
  • Privacy policy
  • Api
  • Contact
© 2024