CC BY 4.0Pelka, SabineSabinePelkaChappin, Émile J.L.Émile J.L.ChappinKlobasa, MarianMarianKlobasaVries, Laurens J. deLaurens J. deVries2022-11-112022-11-112022https://publica.fraunhofer.de/handle/publica/428569https://doi.org/10.24406/publica-48310.1016/j.esr.2022.10099210.24406/publica-483Household electricity use has an increasing impact on the overall energy system. Numerous proposals have been made to support households to consume electricity in a system-friendlier manner. By breaking these proposals down into functions and how they are performed, this paper identifies four distinctive governance designs: energy communities, variable electricity tariffs, local energy markets and virtual power plants. None covers all the functions required and each addresses different trade-offs that households face. Energy communities focus on investing in energy assets, while the others target the operation of households’ assets, including demand response. Virtual power plants attract profit-oriented consumers, while the others primarily target normative consumers.enEnergy market designDemand responseDistributed energy resourcesVariable tariffLocal energy marketVirtual power plantEnergy communityjournal article