CC BY-NC-ND 4.0Ribeiro, BarbaraBarbaraRibeiroShapira, PhilipPhilipShapiraBenneworth, PaulPaulBenneworthBengtsson, LarsLarsBengtssonBührer, SusanneSusanneBührerCastro-Martínez, ElenaElenaCastro-MartínezHansen, MeikenMeikenHansenJarmai, KatharinaKatharinaJarmaiLindner, RalfRalfLindnerOlmos-Peñuela, JuliaJuliaOlmos-PeñuelaOtt, CordulaCordulaOtt2022-03-159.9.20202020https://publica.fraunhofer.de/handle/publica/41420010.31235/osf.io/ayd6cThe publication of our article ""Introducing the dilemma of societal alignment for inclusive and responsible research and innovation"" (Ribeiro et al., 2018) was accompanied by three commentaries (Guston, 2018; Nordmann, 2018; and Kuzma and Roberts, 2018). In the original article, we invoked Collingridge's dilemma of the social control of technology to introduce a complementary dilemma of ""societal alignment"" in the governance of science, technology and innovation. Thoughtful and challenging critiques were presented in the three commentaries. In this paper, as completed in June 2019, we respond to those critiques and, in so doing, seek to further clarify and extend our arguments.enCollingridgeInclusive innovationResponsible research and innovationSocietal alignmentGovernance of scienceTechnology and innovation303600paper