Dr. rer. nat.

Hecker, Dirk

Filters
1 1
Reset filters

Settings
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Publication
    The why and how of trustworthy AI
    ( 2022-09-03)
    Schmitz, Anna
    ;
    Akila, Maram
    ;
    Hecker, Dirk
    ;
    Poretschkin, Maximilian
    ;
    Wrobel, Stefan
    Artificial intelligence is increasingly penetrating industrial applications as well as areas that affect our daily lives. As a consequence, there is a need for criteria to validate whether the quality of AI applications is sufficient for their intended use. Both in the academic community and societal debate, an agreement has emerged under the term “trustworthiness” as the set of essential quality requirements that should be placed on an AI application. At the same time, the question of how these quality requirements can be operationalized is to a large extent still open. In this paper, we consider trustworthy AI from two perspectives: the product and organizational perspective. For the former, we present an AI-specific risk analysis and outline how verifiable arguments for the trustworthiness of an AI application can be developed. For the second perspective, we explore how an AI management system can be employed to assure the trustworthiness of an organization with respect to its handling of AI. Finally, we argue that in order to achieve AI trustworthiness, coordinated measures from both product and organizational perspectives are required.
  • Publication
    Trustworthy Use of Artificial Intelligence
    ( 2019-07)
    Cremers, Armin B.
    ;
    Englander, Alex
    ;
    Gabriel, Markus
    ;
    Hecker, Dirk
    ;
    Mock, Michael
    ;
    Poretschkin, Maximilian
    ;
    Rosenzweig, Julia
    ;
    Rostalski, Frauke
    ;
    Sicking, Joachim
    ;
    Volmer, Julia
    ;
    Voosholz, Jan
    ;
    Voß, Angelika
    ;
    Wrobel, Stefan
    This publication forms a basis for the interdisciplinary development of a certification system for artificial intelligence. In view of the rapid development of artificial intelligence with disruptive and lasting consequences for the economy, society, and everyday life, it highlights the resulting challenges that can be tackled only through interdisciplinary dialog between IT, law, philosophy, and ethics. As a result of this interdisciplinary exchange, it also defines six AI-specific audit areas for trustworthy use of artificial intelligence. They comprise fairness, transparency, autonomy and control, data protection as well as security and reliability while addressing ethical and legal requirements. The latter are further substantiated with the aim of operationalizability.