Hier finden Sie wissenschaftliche Publikationen aus den Fraunhofer-Instituten.

But do they deliver? Participatory agenda setting on the test bed

: Rosa, Aaron; Gudowsky, Niklas; Warnke, Philine

Volltext urn:nbn:de:0011-n-5065830 (610 KByte PDF)
MD5 Fingerprint: 2ea273f0e0c384c47405c09ef7aa5cb6
(CC) by
Erstellt am: 16.8.2018

European Journal of Futures Research 6 (2018), Art. 14, 12 S.
ISSN: 2195-4194 (Print)
ISSN: 2195-2248 (Online)
Zeitschriftenaufsatz, Elektronische Publikation
Fraunhofer ISI ()
participatory foresight; agenda setting; research and innovation governance; comparison

In this contribution, we investigate how results produced in a large-scale participatory agenda setting process differ from results of expert-based foresight studies with a similar aim of informing EU research and innovation (R&I) policy. After providing a theoretical positioning and an overview of the EU-wide participatory agenda setting process CIMULACT - Citizen and Multi-Actor Consultation on Horizon 2020, we describe our developed analytical approach that includes five analytical steps and calculation of three metrics. By comparative reading, analysis and scoring of 16 expert-based foresight reports, we produced data for the metrics that allow for discerning between (a) how many of the analyzed foresight reports cover a respective topic from CIMULACT, (b) how well this basic coverage aligns qualitatively, and (c) comprehensive comparison of each CIMULACT topic with respect to all surveyed reports. To discern differences, we chose those results (research topics) from CIMULACT that were also sufficiently covered by expert-based reports. Our findings suggest that such citizen-based, multi-actor co-created policy advice qualitatively differs considerably from that elicited by expert-based reports, in terms of direction and focus of the proposed R&I agenda.