Hier finden Sie wissenschaftliche Publikationen aus den Fraunhofer-Instituten.

Evaluation and comparison of anomaly detection algorithms in annotated datasets from the maritime domain

: Anneken, Mathias; Fischer, Yvonne; Beyerer, Jürgen

Postprint urn:nbn:de:0011-n-3773454 (1.9 MByte PDF)
MD5 Fingerprint: c347db5705740774a0549d1ea7e10051
© IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE.
Created on: 9.2.2016

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers -IEEE-:
IntelliSys 2015, SAI Intelligent Systems Conference. Proceedings : November 10-11, 2015, London, UK
Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2015
ISBN: 978-1-4673-7606-8
Intelligent Systems Conference (IntelliSys) <2015, London>
Conference Paper, Electronic Publication
Fraunhofer IOSB ()
anomaly detection; Gaussian mixture model; kernel density estimation; maritime domain

Anomaly detection supports human decision makers in their surveillance tasks to ensure security. To gain the trust of the operator, it is important to develop a robust system, which gives the operator enough insight to take a rational choice about future steps. In this work, the maritime domain is investigated. Here, anomalies occur in trajectory data. Hence, a normal model for the trajectories has to be estimated. Despite the goal of anomaly detection in real life operations, until today, mostly simulated anomalies have been evaluated to measure the performance of different algorithms. Therefore, an annotation tool is developed to provide a ground truth on a non-simulative dataset. The annotated data is used to compare different algorithms with each other. For the given dataset, first experiments are conducted with the Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) and the Kernel Density Estimator (KDE). For the evaluation of the algorithms, precision, recall, and f1-score are compared.