Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft

Publica

Hier finden Sie wissenschaftliche Publikationen aus den Fraunhofer-Instituten.

Experimental comparison of a Gated-Viewing system and a 3-D Flash LADAR system in terms of range precision under different turbulence conditions

 
: Göhler, Benjamin; Lutzmann, Peter

:
Fulltext (PDF; )

AMA Fachverband für Sensorik e.V., Wunstorf:
Sensor + Test Conference 2011. Proceedings. CD-ROM : 06.07.-09.07.2011, Nürnberg, 15th International Conference on Infrared Sensors & Systems (SENSOR 2011); 12th International Conference on Infrared Sensors and Systems (IRS(2) 2011); 10th INternational Confernce on Optical Technologies for Sensing Measurement (OPTO 2011)
Wunstorf: AMA Service, 2011
ISBN: 978-3-9810993-9-3
pp.145-150
Sensor + Test Conference <2011, Nürnberg>
International Conference on Infrared Sensors & Systems (IRS2) <12, 2011, Nürnberg>
International Conference on Optical Technologies for Sensing and Measurement (OPTO) <10, 2011, Nürnberg>
International Conference on Sensors and Measurement Technology (SENSOR) <15, 2011, Nürnberg>
English
Conference Paper, Electronic Publication
Fraunhofer IOSB ()

Abstract
For security and military applications, long-range automatic target recognition is a very important task. Therefore, in addition to a 2-D passive or active intensity image, 3-D information of a target is desirable. Besides a LADAR system, also a Gated-Viewing (GV) system can provide depth information by simply sliding the gate through the scenery. In this paper, the GV camera LIVARÒ 500 (Intevac, 640 × 480 pixels (binning mode), EBCMOS) is compared to a 3-D Flash LADAR camera (Advanced Scientific Concepts, 128 × 128 pixels, InGaAs APD) in terms of range precision. The sliding gates method requires several GV images (several laser pulses) with stepwise increased camera delay times. For the 3-D Flash LADAR camera, one laser pulse is sufficient because, for each pixel, the range is determined by the time-of-flight method. We have combined both cameras with the same pulsed laser illuminator with a wavelength of 1.57 ?m. The maximal laser pulse energy was 67 mJ. We have conducted field measurements at different times of day. Two reflectance panels and a vehicle at a distance of 2 km were recorded. The plates were positioned diagonal to the line of sight with an angle of about 45 degrees. They were used to determine the range precision, defined as the error standard deviation. Atmospheric turbulence, i.e. refractive index fluctuation along the propagation path, affects the laser pulse resulting in a degraded intensity image. The laser scintillometer BLS 900 (Scintec) measured the refractive index structure parameter Cn 2 along the propagation path. The comparison of the two cameras was carried out under different turbulence conditions.

: http://publica.fraunhofer.de/documents/N-192597.html